At least 38 citizen journalists and media workers have been killed by the Assad government since the start of the uprising in Syria in March last year. Break the silence, scan the QR code or disseminate in other ways.
Thursday, 26 July 2012
Thursday, 19 July 2012
Don't poison our Olympics
In 1984, between 7,000 and 10,000 people were killed immediately by a
toxic gas leak from a pesticide factory in Bhopal. Over the next 20 years a
further 15,000 people died and the site is still contaminated, affecting the
human rights of over 100,000 people.
Today Dow Chemical, a sponsor of this year’s Olympic Games, owns the
company responsible for the leak. However, it has never addressed the on-going
human rights impact of the catastrophe. Find out more here.
A unique
exhibition is opening today, 19 July, at Amnesty International’s UK offices in Shoreditch, East London, to highlight the Olympics
link to Dow Chemical, a sponsor of this year’s games. The
multi-sensory art installation on Bhopal by acclaimed Indian artist Samar Jodha is open until the end
of July.
Samar
Jodha’s temperature-controlled metal container recreates the wintry night of
the 2 December 1984 in Bhopal, with 3D images, blow-torched mannequins and a
soundscape. The soundscape starts silently, and there are notably no alarms or
sirens throughout, as on the night, just the noise of crickets and the hum of
the factory. The sound of gas escaping from the factory can be heard as the
viewer moves through the container and towards the end of the journey, the
sound of the first Bhopal victim struggling to breath.
Born in
Jodhpur, India, Jodha has relatives in Bhopal including an uncle who worked at
the chemical plant and another who was a doctor. Jodha believes the
installation will help prevent "the constant struggle of memory against
forgetting."
Renowned London street artist Pure Evil, has also painted a sign on the
Amnesty building, which reads: ‘Don’t Poison our Olympics; Tell Lord Coe to
stop defending Dow.’
Amnesty is asking the public to contact Lord Coe, the head of the
committee organising the London Olympic Games, (LOCOG) to ask him to retract
his committee’s defence of Dow Chemical and to apologise to Bhopal's survivors. Apparently, Seb Coe has responded by blocking
the email service the organization uses, but you can still email Lord Coe directly from your own email address. Click here for more information.
Saturday, 16 June 2012
Iran Tribunal to Uncover Iran's Srebrenica
This picture is part of Prison Memoir in Painting by Iranian artist Soudabeh Ardavan. She
spent eight years in Iranian prisons and survived the 1988 massacre. She
painted this and many other prison's paintings by using her hair as a brush and
toothpaste or tea as paint. She now lives in exile in Sweden.
-->
A
People’s Tribunal will sit at Amnesty International’s headquarters in London on
June 18-22 to unearth secrets the Iranian regime have managed to keep buried
for more than two decades. Survivors of torture and families of
murder victims have managed against all odds to set up this international court
to investigate the Iranian regime’s biggest state crime.
“When
they took me to the death committee in Gohardasht prison, the lobby was piled
high with sandals, glasses and blindfolds. That’s all that was left of our
friends. They are all gone and I am alive. I am alive to tell their story.
That’s my only goal,” says Mehdi Aslani, 53, who survived a mass massacre of
political prisoners in Iran the summer of 1988.
Aslani
and thousands of other victims have waited 24 years for this, but now they will
finally have their day in court.
“The
Tribunal’s main purpose is allowing evidence to be heard and allowing the world
to find out what really happened in the 1980s in Iran,” says John Cooper, QC,
chair of the Iran Tribunal’s steering committee. “It is incredible that torture
survivors and families of murder victims have managed to achieve this on their
own - and it is shocking they had to do this all on their own – that the UN did
nothing.”
In the
summer of 1988, the Islamic Republic of Iran executed in secret an estimated
5000 political prisoners across the country. The killing, ordered by an
extraordinary fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini himself, was relentless and
efficient. Prisoners, including women and teenagers, were loaded on forklift
trucks and hanged from cranes and beams in groups of five or six at a time in
half-hourly intervals all day-long. The victims were intellectuals, students,
leftists, members of opposition parties and ethnic and religious minorities.
Many were jailed for no more than distributing leaflets, having a banned book
or being accused by “a trusted friend of the regime,” according to Amnesty
International.
The
massacre was the climax of a massive elimination campaign conducted by the
regime from 1981 to 1989: during that bloody decade around 20,000 political
prisoners were executed across Iran.
“It is
what I would term (based on my past work with the UN in Bosnia) ‘Iran’s
Srebrenica’: a monumental atrocity that cannot remain unanswered,” says Payam Akhavan, professor of International Law at McGill University, first UN war
crime prosecutor at The Hague and member of the Iran Tribunal.
The
deliberate and systematic manner in which these executions took place
constitutes a crime against humanity under international law, according to many
human rights lawyers. (Widespread and systematic executions of a civilian
population across the country, planned and ordered by the highest ranks of the
Iranian government.)
Yet, to
date, more than two decades after the massacre, there are still no
investigation into this crime, no international pressure on the Iranian
government to do so, and no recognition from Iran or the international
community. In fact, many of the perpetrators are still in power and the
international media seem to deliberately avoid covering this issue.
Over the past decades, survivors and families of the
victims – many are mothers because the majority of the victims were very young
- have campaigned for justice.
They have sent petitions to the UN, organized rallies and seminars and
disseminated information on the Internet – but no one is listening.
| After the massacre/ Soudabeth Ardavan |
“We are in the information age: with a click of a mouse,
you can know what is happening in the far corners of the world. Yet more than
5,000 people were killed in two months in Iran and no one knows about it. It’s
like nothing happened,” says Aslani, who lives in exile in Germany.
So the
survivors and families of the victims have taken the matter into their own
hands. In 2007, they have come together to form the Iran Tribunal,
modeled on the Russell Tribunal set up by British philosopher Bertrand Russelland French writer Jean-Paul Sartre in 1966 to examine American intervention in
Vietnam, and the subsequent Russell Tribunals on Chile, Iraq and Argentine.
Like these tribunals, the Iran Tribunal won’t have any legal status, but will
act as a tribunal of conscience to deal with violations of international law
that have not been recognized nor dealt with by existing international
jurisdictions.
After
five years of fundraising, outreach and assembling a team of prominent lawyers,
the People’s Tribunal is now ready to proceed. It is organized in two parts: a
Truth Commission and a Tribunal.
The Truth Commission, during which the court will hear and examine oral
and written evidence from dozens of witnesses, is held at AI’s headquarters in
London on June 18-22. The Tribunal
will then meet on October 25-27 in The Hague to issue a verdict.
Attendance is free, but you need to register. For more information, click here. To follow the proceedings live, click here.
Thursday, 14 June 2012
Europe's deadly frontiers - EU must stand up for migrants
People move to Europe for different reasons. Some flee persecution or
war. Others try to abandon a life of chronic poverty. They hope to find a
better, safer future here. But many never make it, partly because Europe’s
border control measures are often enforced with little regards to the harm they
might cause.
Last year, at least
1,500 men, women and children drowned in the Mediterranean struggling to reach
Europe, according to Amnesty International. Some of these deaths could have
been avoided if rescue attempts had been made in time.
In recent years, some survivors have been forced back to countries where
they faced abuse and ill-treatment. On several occasions Italy pushed back
people to Libya where they were detained and mistreated. In an environment where
there is little transparency or oversight, human rights abuses often go
unpunished along Europe’s coasts and borders.
In response, Amnesty International is launching a new campaign to
highlight the plight of ‘people on the move’. The When you don’t exist campaign
will call on the EU’s governments and institutions to stop exposing people to
danger on Europe’s borders.
Nicolas Beger,
director of Amnesty’s European Institutions Office, said: “For the EU, reinforcing Europe’s borders clearly
trumps saving lives. By attempting to curb ‘irregular migration’, European
countries have bolstered border control measures beyond European frontiers
without regard to the human cost. Far from public view, these measures put
people at risk of serious abuse.”
The campaign includes an online public petition to MEPs, urging them to
fulfill their ‘watchdog’ role and hold governments and institutions accountable
for how they treat migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers in border areas.
Find out more here.
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Stop Female Genital Mutilation in the UK
-->
Each year, tens of thousands of girls in the UK are
forced to have their genitals cut, often with no anesthesia. But there has been
never been a conviction for female genital mutilation here -- even
though in London alone, police have received 166 complaints in the last four
years.
Undercover reporters
for the Sunday Times recently caught three medics on film offering to mutilate
young girls, massively scaling up the pressure on law enforcement to act.
Avaaz, the global civic organization, is urging all of us in the UK to use this
moment to call on Home Secretary
Theresa May for real accountability. She is in charge of every police
chief in England and Wales -- if she
takes the issue up personally, the entire police system could be shaken into
action.
Avaaz member Ruth
Burnett has created a petition calling on the Home Secretary to start prosecuting people involved with these
assaults and already more than 2000 people have signed. If they reach
20,000 signatures, Avaaz will deliver it directly to Home Secretary May and the
head of Metropolitan Police Force -- click
here to sign and forward to everyone:
Female Genital
Mutilation is a custom widespread in nearly 30 Middle Eastern and African
countries. But FGM has been illegal in
the UK since 1985 and in 2003 the law was tightened to stop girls being
taken abroad for the operation -- on so-called “FGM holidays”.
Still, the practice is
widespread here in the UK. When the undercover Sunday Times reporter explained
to Mohammed Sahib, an alternative medicine practitioner in East London that he
represented a Ghanaian couple who wanted to have their two daughters -- aged 10
and 13 -- circumcised, he said “I can do it here,” confirming that he
would both remove the clitoris and sew up the vagina. “This is my work. I
know what I’m doing. I’m going to do it. I will tell you how [much] to pay [for
one]: £750.”
Home Secretary Theresa May
-- who oversees women’s issues for David Cameron, and who has the power to hold
police chiefs all across England and Wales accountable -- recently admitted people would be “shocked”
by the number of young girls in Britain subjected to FGM. Now we can push her
to take concrete action to end FGM in the UK -- please to sign Avaaz' petition now and share with everyone.
For more information, click here.
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
Women Farmers Grow Food and Peace
-->
In periods of affluence, most
people get along fine – even when they are from different ethnic or religious
backgrounds, but when resources are scarce, former friends and neighbours often
turn into foes. We have seen this too many times throughout history. Across the world, food
insecurity fuels conflict and in turn, conflict fuels food insecurity, creating
a vicious circle. For example, when
in 1994, genocide engulfed Rwanda, this human catastrophe was fuelled by ethnic
hatred, but economic crisis, poverty and hunger also played their part.
This vicious circle is found
around the world and women can play a vital role in breaking it. One in seven
of the world's population is malnourished. The UN Food Agency estimates that by
giving equal rights to women farmers – meaning giving them the same access as men to
productive resources such as land and credit – 100 to 150 million people would
be lifted out of hunger.
The charity, Women for Women International, which aids women who have lived through wars around the world,
has launched an innovative programme, helping women to put food on the
table, earn an income and move from victim to productive member of
society. The Commercial Integrated Farming Initiative (CIFI) programme trains women in organic farming techniques
and food production in Rwanda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria, South
Sudan and Afghanistan.
To find out more or sponsor a woman, click here and watch this video:
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
Disarm dictators - call for a bullet-proof Arms Trade Treaty
This
July, governments across the world will draw up the world’s first ever Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). Let’s make sure it’s tough enough to disarm dictators,
warlords and human rights abusers.
We’ve
recently seen Syrian soldiers turning their guns and missiles on their own
people – men, women and children shot down in cold blood. We’ve seen dictators like Colonel
Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein, whose regimes tortured, murdered and raped so many
men and women. We know of countries like Somalia, where children are given AK-47s to fight and kill, or the
Democratic Republic of Congo, where soldiers and members of armed groups rape
women and men at gunpoint.
These
are not big arms producing countries. They rely almost entirely on buying
weapons from abroad. What if none
of them had been able to buy their deadly weapons? What if there was a legally
binding treaty that meant no arms could ever be sold to anyone who was likely
to use them to commit human rights abuse?
If
such treaty existed, it could literally save hundreds of thousands of lives and
prevent human rights atrocities across the world.
After
20 years of campaigning by various human rights organizations, this treaty is
on the verge of becoming a reality. Governments representatives from around the
world are meeting at the United Nations in July to negotiate the text of the Arms Trade Treaty.
This
treaty has many facets, but it has to make absolutely clear that arms sales
must not be authorized if they are likely to contribute directly to serious
human rights abuses. If this statement is not clearly included, the treaty will
be a failure and a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to rein in abuse will be lost.
Amnesty International, one of the organizations which conceived the idea of an
International Arms Trade Treaty two decades ago, is campaigning in the UK and
abroad to make sure the treaty is as effective as it could be. Amnesty activists will be traveling to
the UN at the end of June to insure that human rights are not traded away at
the final crucial negotiations, and they are now putting pressure on our government and
David Cameron in particular to support a human rights based treaty.
This
treaty, says Amnesty’s Arms Trade
Campaigner Olly Sprague, could be “one of the most significant human rights
breakthroughs in history.”
Please
support Amnesty's campaign and help pay for vital campaigning material and tools to
lobby for a bullet-proof treaty. To donate, click here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



