A dark, rancid corner Borri says journalists have failed to explain Syria’s civil war because editors only want ‘blood.’ (Alessio Romenzi) |
Here is an interesting, infuriating and disturbing
article about the risks freelance journalists covering the civil war in Syria
have to take and the editors who insist on “blood and bang-bang” rather
than explanations and the impact of war on the people who have to live through it.
Behind the harsh reality of journalists’ life in conflict zones is the larger problem of reduced staff positions driving reporters to the front lines without the support of a publication, CJR points out.
The piece has received hundreds of comments from
readers. And many wanted to help. CJR has published a subsequent article asking
freelancers to share ideas and organizations, which can help, protect and
support journalists. Here is what they have come up with so far. The site will be updated regularly.
• The Committee to Protect Journalists, which acts
as a line of first defence when journalists working in conflict zones are
imprisoned, kidnapped, or otherwise
harmed.
• Reporters Instructed in Saving Colleagues:
Reporters on staff at publications often receive medical training for managing
battle wounds. RISC fills the gap for independent journalists, providing
medical training to journalists who cover conflict free of charge.
• The Dart Center: Columbia’s Dart Center provides
a roster of resources for journalists trying to cover stories of violence and
conflict with sensitivity.
No comments:
Post a Comment