One of the reports produced by MDI |
Reading or watching news
reports on conflicts, immigration, minorities and other controversial and
sensitive issues, I often wonder whether journalists do more harm than good.
Journalism can be one of
the best tools for change and can play an important role in the fight against
ignorance, prejudice and bigotry. But it can also exacerbate divisions and tensions,
and fuel fear and hostility.
We have seen extreme
examples on how the media can incite hatred and violence in Rwanda and the
former Yugoslavia. But most of the time, the media’s unhelpful coverage of
minorities and sensitive issues is unintentional. It stems from ignorance,
sloppy journalism and lack of time. Many stories on immigration in the UK or
about Roma in Europe, for example, don’t quote immigrants or Roma, but only experts
and members of the public or groups objecting to them. Not surprisingly, these stories lack
important information and empathy. Over-stretched
journalists simply don’t have the time to search for the right people to
interview - and the 24h news cycle and ever-faster pace of social media are
exacerbating the problem.
I recently had an interesting conversation with someone
who has worked on these issues over the past 15 years – and made a huge impact:
the amazing Milica Pesic. She is the founder and Executive Director of the
Media Diversity Institute, a charity which promotes responsible journalism as
means to lessen inter-group conflict, increase tolerance, encourage dialogue
among individuals and groups coming from different backgrounds and support a
deeper public understanding of ethnic, religious, sexual and gender diversity.
They do this through research and professional media training.
“Responsible, ethical
journalism is thinking journalism. It provides fair, accurate, informed and
reflective coverage of events and issues that are important to people and
society," said Pesic.
MDI was born out of the wars in the Balkans some 15
years ago. Pesic, worked as a journalist for TV Serbia during the 1980s and
early 1990s. After refusing to participate in the propaganda machine created by
the Serbian regime, she was sacked from her job. Horrified by the
unprofessional and unethical way the media fuelled the conflict by increasing tensions
between ethnic groups, she decided to setup MDI as a way to prevent the media
being used in this way.
From initial work in South East Europe, MDI took
its expertise to the volatile Caucasus region, and then to the Middle East and
North Africa, and South East Asia. Over the last few years, MDI has brought its
experience from more troubled regions to address tensions in increasingly
diverse Western European societies.
In our highly divided and divisive world and our
rapidly-changing media landscape, organisations like MDI are more needed than
ever. But I am wondering how to extend these ideas and training to the millions
of people on Twitter, FB and other social media…
No comments:
Post a Comment